<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion: Why a champions trophy&#8230;. now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/opinion-why-a-champions-trophy-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/opinion-why-a-champions-trophy-now/</link>
	<description>Just another Wordpress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Gaskell</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/opinion-why-a-champions-trophy-now/#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Gaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/opinion-why-a-champions-trophy-now/#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a joke, and just devalues the World cup.       A lot of the Cricket media think the Champions trophy is pointless anyway (apart from the money).   I think it has its place though, guaranteeing games for decent but unfashionable teams like New Zealand and Srilanka.   
  I completely agree with the timetable you suggest, if it were held midway between each world cup I could see it growing into quite a prestigious and marketable tournament.                    I think this years format is quite good, a short qualifying round then a short pool stage.    It&#039;s a shame that one group could hold Aus India and West Indies, given their recent frolic in Malaysia.

&quot;The most worrying thing for the PCB was that England v Pakistan sold for $9 mil, $2 mil higher than Pakistan v India series, which is quite an unthinkable thing.&quot;
In a way its good that Pakistani fans are discerning and want to see differant teams.    I think the the 2 boards have learnt their lesson and are now avoiding overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a joke, and just devalues the World cup.       A lot of the Cricket media think the Champions trophy is pointless anyway (apart from the money).   I think it has its place though, guaranteeing games for decent but unfashionable teams like New Zealand and Srilanka.<br />
  I completely agree with the timetable you suggest, if it were held midway between each world cup I could see it growing into quite a prestigious and marketable tournament.                    I think this years format is quite good, a short qualifying round then a short pool stage.    It&#8217;s a shame that one group could hold Aus India and West Indies, given their recent frolic in Malaysia.</p>
<p>&#8220;The most worrying thing for the PCB was that England v Pakistan sold for $9 mil, $2 mil higher than Pakistan v India series, which is quite an unthinkable thing.&#8221;<br />
In a way its good that Pakistani fans are discerning and want to see differant teams.    I think the the 2 boards have learnt their lesson and are now avoiding overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
