<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion: Rocks Paper Scissors championship on ESPN&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/</link>
	<description>Just another Wordpress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cuen Lucas</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-13271</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuen Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-13271</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another on ESPN, &quot;international stacking&quot; It&#039;s to see who is the fastest to stack plastic drinking cups. 

I can&#039;t believe that the USACA and MLC between them can&#039;t make a case for broadcasting cricket. As I&#039;m typing this I&#039;m watching a really entertaining game between Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Ridiculous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another on ESPN, &#8220;international stacking&#8221; It&#8217;s to see who is the fastest to stack plastic drinking cups. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe that the USACA and MLC between them can&#8217;t make a case for broadcasting cricket. As I&#8217;m typing this I&#8217;m watching a really entertaining game between Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasir M. Khan</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11390</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasir M. Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11390</guid>
		<description>In the comment above, the line &quot;... fail to understand how $1million in the US can be more lucrative  ...&quot; should have been &quot;... fail to understand how a market of 1 million expats in the US can be more lucrative  ...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the comment above, the line &#8220;&#8230; fail to understand how $1million in the US can be more lucrative  &#8230;&#8221; should have been &#8220;&#8230; fail to understand how a market of 1 million expats in the US can be more lucrative  &#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasir M. Khan</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11371</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasir M. Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11371</guid>
		<description>Ram, 

I dont know if this statement by Percy Sonn was 100% accurate about US (read south asian expats in the US) being the second largest market for cricket.... I fail to understand how $1million in the US can be more lucrative than, say, Australia, England, even SA or Pakistan....... 

This statement may have been given from the perspective of India..... that for India, US is the second biggest cricket market........

Now to explain this a little bit...... the only reason why US is a big market for cricket is the exhorbitant pay per view pricing of the cricket matches........ You are talking to &#039;stupid fan #1&#039; here...... for the current World Cup, I paid $200...... for Pakistan&#039;s Tour of India in 2005, I paid $250, and then also stayed up all night on weekdays to watch the matches........ the only reason why US is a lucrative market is because people are willing to pay tonnes of money to view the games, even at odd hours....... you only have to see the standard of the advertising, and the number, to see that the networks are not making a killing by the ads, like it is in the sub continent........ hence, taking away the pay per view model will not cut it for the network....... they will not make a cent that way in profit......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ram, </p>
<p>I dont know if this statement by Percy Sonn was 100% accurate about US (read south asian expats in the US) being the second largest market for cricket&#8230;. I fail to understand how $1million in the US can be more lucrative than, say, Australia, England, even SA or Pakistan&#8230;&#8230;. </p>
<p>This statement may have been given from the perspective of India&#8230;.. that for India, US is the second biggest cricket market&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Now to explain this a little bit&#8230;&#8230; the only reason why US is a big market for cricket is the exhorbitant pay per view pricing of the cricket matches&#8230;&#8230;.. You are talking to &#8217;stupid fan #1&#8242; here&#8230;&#8230; for the current World Cup, I paid $200&#8230;&#8230; for Pakistan&#8217;s Tour of India in 2005, I paid $250, and then also stayed up all night on weekdays to watch the matches&#8230;&#8230;.. the only reason why US is a lucrative market is because people are willing to pay tonnes of money to view the games, even at odd hours&#8230;&#8230;. you only have to see the standard of the advertising, and the number, to see that the networks are not making a killing by the ads, like it is in the sub continent&#8230;&#8230;.. hence, taking away the pay per view model will not cut it for the network&#8230;&#8230;. they will not make a cent that way in profit&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11364</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11364</guid>
		<description>Bruce...It&#039;s widely known that the US is the 2nd biggest revenue earner for the ICC from its global media rights mainly because of the presence of expats from cricketing countries...In this context, I don&#039;t understand why nobody seems interested to telecast cricket on cable TV as is the case in full member nations...Isn&#039;t there a single expat working in the various American TV networks who knows the potential for telecasting cricket in the US?...Afterall, cricket IS shown on cable TV in similar expat-filled countries like UAE and..I think Canada as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce&#8230;It&#8217;s widely known that the US is the 2nd biggest revenue earner for the ICC from its global media rights mainly because of the presence of expats from cricketing countries&#8230;In this context, I don&#8217;t understand why nobody seems interested to telecast cricket on cable TV as is the case in full member nations&#8230;Isn&#8217;t there a single expat working in the various American TV networks who knows the potential for telecasting cricket in the US?&#8230;Afterall, cricket IS shown on cable TV in similar expat-filled countries like UAE and..I think Canada as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Gaskell</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11336</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Gaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11336</guid>
		<description>&quot;I still do not understand why the US isn’t a part of the ICC TV rights market when the fact is it is supposedly the 2nd biggest?…&quot;

In what respect? It certainly isn&#039;t the 2nd most valuable, and in absolute numbers there are hardly more South Asian Americans than there are English, Australians, Bangladeshis...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I still do not understand why the US isn’t a part of the ICC TV rights market when the fact is it is supposedly the 2nd biggest?…&#8221;</p>
<p>In what respect? It certainly isn&#8217;t the 2nd most valuable, and in absolute numbers there are hardly more South Asian Americans than there are English, Australians, Bangladeshis&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11332</guid>
		<description>I still do not understand why the US isn&#039;t a part of the ICC TV rights market when the fact is it is supposedly the 2nd biggest?...Also, why doesn&#039;t the ICC include the WC qualifiers (along with WCL Div 1 and maybe Div 2) as part of the TV deal when U19 WCs can be included?

I find it strange that even broadcasters, who&#039;re driven by viewership numbers, can remain so ignorant of the potential benefits of exploiting newer, hitherto unexplored markets for the sport and the channel!!...It&#039;s scarcely believable that the ICC hasn&#039;t recognized this when other sports did so 15 years back!!!...However, it remains to be seen if the securing of ICC&#039;s TV rights by ESPN STAR and the subsequent acquisition of Cricinfo by US-based ESPN will make any difference to cricket entering the mainstream US and/or other foreign markets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still do not understand why the US isn&#8217;t a part of the ICC TV rights market when the fact is it is supposedly the 2nd biggest?&#8230;Also, why doesn&#8217;t the ICC include the WC qualifiers (along with WCL Div 1 and maybe Div 2) as part of the TV deal when U19 WCs can be included?</p>
<p>I find it strange that even broadcasters, who&#8217;re driven by viewership numbers, can remain so ignorant of the potential benefits of exploiting newer, hitherto unexplored markets for the sport and the channel!!&#8230;It&#8217;s scarcely believable that the ICC hasn&#8217;t recognized this when other sports did so 15 years back!!!&#8230;However, it remains to be seen if the securing of ICC&#8217;s TV rights by ESPN STAR and the subsequent acquisition of Cricinfo by US-based ESPN will make any difference to cricket entering the mainstream US and/or other foreign markets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasir M. Khan</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11327</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasir M. Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11327</guid>
		<description>ICC has no interest in doing that...... All that they do is to fool themselves into believing that if 11 expats make up a US team, it will attract fanatic following from the mainstream nationals....... such a team cannot even attract a remote interest from the expats, let alone mainstream guys......

After where UAE are with top notch facilities, and 50% of the country as expats, the reality is hitting ICC in the face, but they still choose to beat around the bush.......

The truth is very simple.... there are only 5 teams in the world right now that have a chance of doing well..... they are Ireland, Scotland, Kenya, Uganda and Nepal....... Afghanistan if they have some stability and some infrastructure........ Netherlands if they can increase their playing numbers....... I dont buy the crap about the game having too little of a profile in Netherlands..... however low the profile of cricket is in Netherlands, it cannot be lower than Germany, Finland, Denmark and Italy, all of whom have in the last 2-3 years had junior programmes involving 3000, 2000, 6000 and 5000 kids respectively....... they all achieved that with associate or affiliate funding........ Netherlands can do more, and if they can increase their playing numbers up to 10-15K, they have the rest of the structure in a pretty decent shape by associate standards.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICC has no interest in doing that&#8230;&#8230; All that they do is to fool themselves into believing that if 11 expats make up a US team, it will attract fanatic following from the mainstream nationals&#8230;&#8230;. such a team cannot even attract a remote interest from the expats, let alone mainstream guys&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>After where UAE are with top notch facilities, and 50% of the country as expats, the reality is hitting ICC in the face, but they still choose to beat around the bush&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>The truth is very simple&#8230;. there are only 5 teams in the world right now that have a chance of doing well&#8230;.. they are Ireland, Scotland, Kenya, Uganda and Nepal&#8230;&#8230;. Afghanistan if they have some stability and some infrastructure&#8230;&#8230;.. Netherlands if they can increase their playing numbers&#8230;&#8230;. I dont buy the crap about the game having too little of a profile in Netherlands&#8230;.. however low the profile of cricket is in Netherlands, it cannot be lower than Germany, Finland, Denmark and Italy, all of whom have in the last 2-3 years had junior programmes involving 3000, 2000, 6000 and 5000 kids respectively&#8230;&#8230;. they all achieved that with associate or affiliate funding&#8230;&#8230;.. Netherlands can do more, and if they can increase their playing numbers up to 10-15K, they have the rest of the structure in a pretty decent shape by associate standards&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>Andrew..I mentioned &#039;exclusive TV channel for the sport&#039;...Cricket would be an additional option to watch on TV, NOT something that would replace more popular sports...In any case, the ICC can always try out newer markets for the forthcoming 20/20 World Championships while forcing the Test boards to do the same for their domestic 20/20 competitions...All sports have been successful in this effort, there&#039;s no reason why the ICC won&#039;t be..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew..I mentioned &#8216;exclusive TV channel for the sport&#8217;&#8230;Cricket would be an additional option to watch on TV, NOT something that would replace more popular sports&#8230;In any case, the ICC can always try out newer markets for the forthcoming 20/20 World Championships while forcing the Test boards to do the same for their domestic 20/20 competitions&#8230;All sports have been successful in this effort, there&#8217;s no reason why the ICC won&#8217;t be..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Nixon</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11315</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11315</guid>
		<description>Ram, it would cost a lot in terms of lost advertisers who won&#039;t want to advertise on cricket when it&#039;s an unknown quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ram, it would cost a lot in terms of lost advertisers who won&#8217;t want to advertise on cricket when it&#8217;s an unknown quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11313</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasirkhan.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/opinion-rocks-paper-scissors-championship-on-espn/#comment-11313</guid>
		<description>Bruce...If you give free live TV feed, I don&#039;t think it would cost much to dedicate an exclusive TV channel for the sport...Once the viewership picks up, advertisers will flock and the issue of having to dedicate the whole day will no longer be an issue...It&#039;s just the question of whether the ICC is interested in doing so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce&#8230;If you give free live TV feed, I don&#8217;t think it would cost much to dedicate an exclusive TV channel for the sport&#8230;Once the viewership picks up, advertisers will flock and the issue of having to dedicate the whole day will no longer be an issue&#8230;It&#8217;s just the question of whether the ICC is interested in doing so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
